Field-tested, not generic
Our work is informed by robots operating on real Dutch farms — so annotators exercise judgement on the hard cases (overlapping canopies, disease, mixed rows) that generic crowd platforms get wrong.
This is where we started, and it is still our deepest domain. We label the field imagery that teaches autonomous weeders, harvesters and crop-monitoring systems to tell a crop from a weed, a healthy plant from a diseased one, and exactly where to act — down to the millimetre.
Because we work alongside our parent company H2L Robotics BV and partner Cropr — who run autonomous laser weeders on real Dutch farms — our annotators see the same hard conditions the machines do: variable light, overlapping canopies, disease, and mixed crop rows. That field context is what separates a dataset that works in the polytunnel from one that works in a real field.
Our work is informed by robots operating on real Dutch farms — so annotators exercise judgement on the hard cases (overlapping canopies, disease, mixed rows) that generic crowd platforms get wrong.
Stem-base keypoints and tight boxes give a laser weeder the exact coordinates to fire — sparing the crop, killing the weed. Precision here isn't cosmetic; it's the difference between a saved plant and a lost one.
We label from emergence to harvest, including disease, so models stay accurate across the season instead of only on the imagery they were first trained on.
Agriculture remains our proving ground, and the QA process built here — multi-pass review, per-annotator quality tracking, consensus IoU — now underpins our work in every other sector.